Monday, January 18, 2010

Why Mainstream Protestantism Is No Longer Mainstream

About the time I graduated from seminary, a major era in American religious life was just beginning its slow, irreversible decline. In specific, a cluster of Protestant denominations professing to constitute the Christian mainstream in this country was about to lose a dominant position in American culture. It took the first twenty years of my professional life for me to see the partial drying up of this once energetically moving stream as something which could be for the better and not only for the worse.

Still struggling to swim in the barely trickling waters of the Protestantist mainstream are at least these denominations today: American Baptist, Disciples of Christ, Episcopal, Evangelical Lutheran, Presbyterian USA, Reformed, United Church of Christ, and United Methodist. Sadly, more than half of their congregations have fewer than 100 members, well below the number that most church strategists now believe is necessary to support a full-time pastor and a minimally effective ministry of nurture and outreach. The average age in most of them continues to be on the increase. And their membership growth, where there is any at all, generally falls far short of the growth rate in the surrounding populations.

Typical mainstream congregations, in spite of their well articulated theologies of inclusiveness, are still predominantly Anglo-American, upper-middle class aspiring, and dependent upon a highly educated clergy. In all three respects, they are swimming upstream against major demographic trends in society and ecclesial trends in the conservative-evangelical churches that currently are dominating the Protestant landscape. Not surprising, therefore, is the Pew organization’s finding that the Protestant mainstream now represents under 20% of the population of the United States.

It has been commonplace to attribute the decline of mainstream Protestantism to its disastrous clinging to a faulty liberal theology when the wider society was turning conservative on just about everything. The liberalism-is-the-problem argument may have had some validity at the beginning, but it is hardly credible anymore. Liberalism’s classic emphases on unity-in-diversity and the pursuit of universal justice are being celebrated just as often by conservative churches as they are by liberal ones today, and the acknowledgment of theological pluralism as inevitable may not be far behind in all but the most off the wall fundamentalist churches and denominations.

More to the point of accounting for the decline is the particular approach that mainstream Protestantism continues to take toward the (legitimate and important) cause of bringing about Christian unity on both a national and world scale. Oversimplified, but not by much, the approach tied ecumenicity very strongly to the promotion of denominational mergers, which many people only slightly misunderstood as an agenda for the creation of a SuperChurch.Two problems have plagued this approach from the beginning. The first was that the ecumenical spirit in this country has flourished best from the grass roots up, and not from institutional structures and hierarchies down. The institutional side of ecumenical movements has always been a pretty high-up/top-down operation, all too frequently enmeshed in clouds of condescending smugness and arrogance that blinds its leaders to Christian action on the ground and in the streets, and the never-ending gatherings of two, three and more disciples there to meet the Lord.

The second problem is that denominations themselves have come increasingly to be viewed as obstacles to, rather than essential supports for, the vitality of Christian congregations and faith. At most denominational headquarters perched atop the shorelines of the Protestant mainstream, visions for regaining cultural position more often than not reduce to faddish schemes for organizational re-structuring, with a little efficiency training for leaders along corporate more than spiritual lines thrown in for good measure. A major consequence is the siphoning off of energy and resources better spent in undergirding the ministry and mission of local congregations themselves. At least, this is the perception of droves of former mainstreamers who believe that there is more breathing room for the Holy Spirit in the non-denominational mega and cyberchurches that are making their presence and influence powerfully evident everywhere.

It may be because I have never been much of a swimmer anyway that splashing around in the diminished waters of the Protestant mainstream still remains for me a fulfilling way to live out the Christian life. If finding some rapids to challenge, as many of my conservative Christian friends are doing with gusto, is your thing, too, then more power to you. But less frenzied streams, whose headwaters continue to be churned by scripture, tradition, experience, and reason in frothy mixes, and whose revelers include dramatically increased numbers of highly involved laypersons, also flow toward that ocean of Being in whose temperate waters there is room for all.


ADDENDUM: On Columns That May Be Worth A Second Reading


Last year, I gave several talks at the end of which readers of this column came up to me and expressed both their appreciation for it and helpful suggestions for making it better. One suggestion was to re-run some of the columns which were favorites at the time, since we are now into the eighth year of Howe About and since new readers may not yet have ventured into searching out the earlier pieces. I came up with an alternative, to list a few and invite readers who may be interested to follow the links to them provided below:


Later on, I will list a few more columns that have also evoked a good bit of response.

ADDENDUM: On Columns That May Be Worth A Second Reading

Last year, I gave several talks at the end of which readers of this column came up to me and expressed both their appreciation for it and helpful suggestions for making it better. One suggestion was to re-run some of the columns which were favorites at the time, since we are now into the eighth year of Howe About and since new readers may not yet have ventured into searching out the earlier pieces. I came up with an alternative, to list a few and invite readers who may be interested to follow the links to them provided below:


Later on, I will list a few more columns that have also evoked a good bit of response.

Monday, January 04, 2010

Small Congregations And The Culture Of Bigness

Some of the most interesting research I came across in the year just ended was by Mark Chaves, a Duke University sociologist, who has been running what he calls the National Congregations Study (NCS) since 1998. The early phase of this study is described in his splendid book, Congregations in America, from Harvard University Press. Chaves redid the study in 2006-7 and made it available at www.soc.duke.edu/natcong. I hope that he will get another book out of his continuing surveys, and that it will generate the kind of discussion that his first book did.

The NCS is worth considerable attention. Over 2700 congregations across the denominational spectrum in this country participated in its second venture, and they shared a staggering amount of valuable information about their inreach, outreach, and sense of identity in general. The most significant findings from this research, in my judgment, include the following:

(1) Across the theological spectrum, and not just in isolated pockets and sharply differentiated worship hours, worship practices continue to trend toward greater informality and lay participation, even as social ministries broaden in scope and intensity.

(2) The dominant theological perspective of Protestant congregations today is increasingly conservative. By way of illustrations, over 80% of the NCS congregations describe their teaching of the Bible in terms which emphasize literalism and inerrancy. Just as strikingly, only 8% of them have female clergy leadership, even though female enrollment in seminaries across the country still hovers around 30%.

(3) The number of all-white congregations is finally beginning to decline, and all indicators are that this trend will continue.

(4) As a general rule of thumb, the vitality of local congregational life is on the rise, while that of denominational infra-structures continues to be on the decline.

Visitors to these congregations are typically finding fewer printed bulletins and more and more sophisticated video projection equipment in use during worship services, along with more personal testimonies, spontaneous “amens,” jumping, shouting, dancing, hand raising, and yes, even drums. And they will discover more outreach ministries that include such things as voter registration initiatives, English as a second language classes, comparative religion study groups, community needs assessment studies, book discussions across a broad spectrum of topics both social and spiritual, and lobbying meetings. With the possible exception of a trend toward fewer choirs and longer sermons, whatever else “conservatism” is coming to mean to members of these congregations, it is clearly not the conservatism of their grandparents‘ generation.

One section of the NCR report in particular continues to give me pause. It has to do with the finding that though most congregations in this country remain small, most church members are no longer in them. In specific, the on the rolls membership of the average congregation is still around 75, a figure unchanged since the first NCS study in 1998. But more and more people are actually attending larger and larger congregations, the very largest 10% of which contains half of all churchgoers today.

The travail of small congregations in America is well known and not difficult to understand. Agribusiness, along with urbanization and suburbanization, have made rural and small town life increasingly difficult to sustain and decreasingly attractive on their own merits.With no ability to achieve the economies of scale that are open to larger congregations, whose members expect programs that titillate, scintillate, and sometimes even inspire --- from womb to tomb --- small congregations are being overwhelmed with the difficulties not of matching the expectations and programs, but of just staying open.

Much to the detriment of American religious life, in my view, these congregations are now being held captive by a dogma from corporate America: grow or die. And a tried and true principle of town and country ministry for decades --- cluster and thrive --- typically evokes responses from denominational officials which at best borders on indifference and at worst, contempt. In this respect at least, denominational structures are more part of the problem than they are of the solution.

Having pastored rural and small town churches myself, I think I am rather well insulated against romanticizing a way of church life that all too easily glosses over the grubby side of a lot of small communities and the declining churches that are striving to survive in them. All too frequently, in neither the communities nor their churches are to be found the opportunities that abound for those who choose to leave them. And yet, in both, there remain people --- the numbers are wholly irrelevant --- to whom the Light of the World has come and who both need and deserve its quelling of the darkness in which they all too often feel themselves to be shrouded. That the quelling must be made manifest by the twos and threes will be as significant to God’s plan of salvation as will be the ministrations of the thousands and the tens of thousands elsewhere.

Friday, January 01, 2010

Howe About Columns June 2002 - December 2009